Just how stupid do the Democrats think you are? Pretty stupid.

Phillip Ellis Jackson over at Intellectual Conservative tries to help us with...
"Deciphering Democrat Doublespeak"

... Which brings us to the launch of FaithfulDemocrats.com, the brainchild of former Democratic Party Chairman David Wilhelm. Its purpose is to show that Democrats go to church too (well, those who aren’t offended by the antique notion that there actually is a God who establishes what is right and wrong independent of human consensus). And these Democrats — church going or otherwise — are moral people just like Republican conservatives. And how do we know this? They just told us they were. Weren’t you listening?

If the only thing I had to comment on was the self-delusion of Democrats who think that words are a substitute for genuine actions, I wouldn’t have written this essay. What’s new about that? The only difference between what the Democrats believe about Iraq today and what they believed in 1998 is the political affiliation of the guy in the Oval Office. Remember these little gems?

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten time since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"[WE] urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
— Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998

Okay. So I still would have written the essay just to make fun of Democrat duplicity, but my essay would have ended here. However, with Pelosi taking things to a new level by invoking her own rendition of the “Golden Rule,” these people aren’t simply being dishonest or disingenuous by manipulating words (that is, when not forgetting that they said them at all). They think you’re too stupid to know that they’re being dishonest! ...

It depends what your definition of morality is.

Related... Sharon Hughes asks: Are you cheering them on?

The liberals and PC police who wave the 'tolerance' banner to propagate their political agendas and version of morality, are also the ones who lay out the red carpet for arrogant dictators to step on here in America, welcoming them into our churches and universities.

To my fellow Americans who are cheering them on, all I can say is that you are blinded by the colors of bigotry, and you don't even know it.

All I can say is be a truth-seeker. There's BS all over the place, so when you take something on authority... choose your authorities wisely.

Evil prevails when good people do nothing.

Update: Speaking of truth, how about checking out The Truth about Muhammad.