Friday, March 30, 2007

John Travolta: Do as I say, not as I do...

With five private jets, Travolta still lectures on global warmingCheck out the Travolta compound to the right.

What a moron:
His serious aviation habit means he is hardly the best person to lecture others on the environment. But John Travolta went ahead and did it anyway.

The 53-year-old actor, a passionate pilot, encouraged his fans to "do their bit" to tackle global warming. But although he readily admitted: "I fly jets", he failed to mention he actually owns five, along with his own private runway.

Clocking up at least 30,000 flying miles in the past 12 months means he has produced an estimated 800 tons of carbon emissions – nearly 100 times the average Briton's tally.

Travolta made his comments this week at the British premiere of his movie, Wild Hogs.

He spoke of the importance of helping the environment by using "alternative methods of fuel" – after driving down the red carpet on a Harley Davidson. ...
Hat tip to Allah at HotAir with Video: Goracle compares environmentalism to the civil rights movement; Update: Gore the favorite for Nobel? The Goracle.

Say Goodbye to Hollywood

I'm, yet again, with Kevin McCullough... liberals get it wrong on nearly everything:
...The heart stopping thing about 2007 is how boldly the immoral leftists will make these naked power grabs.

From the taking of our money that we work hard to earn and use to provide for our loved ones - to the direct communication, sympathy, and willingness to give the benefit of the doubt to those who wish to kill us - liberals are attempting to construct a society that few of us should wish to live in. Should they be left to their own devices they will rig the system to their own benefit and only the voices of "We the People" are able to stop them.

Liberals are almost always wrong, on nearly everything, and to not recognize it accelerates our own, painful, and dramatic destruction.
What's in your wallet?

Update: Who's the environmentalist?

Cox & Forkum

Labels: , , , , ,

Embedded Michael Yon: 'I think Petraeus’ plan has a serious chance of working despite heavy odds'...

Michael Yon storeFrom his latest... RUBS #2: (Raw, Unedited and Barely Spell-checked)
This is the second installment of RUBS, a new way of posting information on the fly and overcoming obstacles to reporting that arc into the Iraq work space with uncanny timing and targeting. With no photos, and barely time for spell checks, RUBS streams at the speed of consciousness. ...

...In fact, within my first three days with 1-4, talking with Iraqi families and police, there were strong indicators that for this little neighborhood, local people and Iraqi police are definitely encouraged. This doesn’t extend to the terrorists, however, and 1-4 Cav has been under fire. Our soldiers showed amazing fire discipline, not even knowing I was just feet behind them with a video camera. (I’ve seen it many times, but finally have got video proof that our guys will go far not to shoot the wrong people.) I saw the 1-4 in a situation where I was certain that they were cleared to fire under the ROE (Rules of Engagement: in this case they were taking fire), yet soldiers with fingers on the triggers held off pending PID (positive identification) of the targets, something I hope to describe later in a non-RUBS format, time permitting. ...
Michael Yon home page... check it out regularly for honest updates on our progress in Iraq.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Get ready for... the Onion News Network

Immigration: The Human Cost

Stay tuned for more...

It's not funny, but here's Glenn Beck and Tom Tancredo with some recent discussion on illegal immigration migration:

Labels: , ,

How Modern Liberals Think...

It's a little long, but well-worth watching if you have the time... Evan Sayet speaks at the Heritage Foundation earlier this month:

(Hat tip WuzzaDem)

Labels: ,

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

'UN Watch exposes the monumental hypocrisies, terrible lies and moral inversions of the new and supposedly reformed UN Human Rights Council'...

UN Watch Executive Director Hillel Neuer confronts the feckless UN Human Rights Council with the truth on March 23, 2007:

Hat tips to LGF and HotAir.

I'm also with Melanie Phillips:
The UN’s Human Rights Council has long been a sick joke, an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. ...

... The UN’s first instinct in defence of human rights — suppress the truth in support of tyranny.

Labels: , , ,

GOP Bloggers Ninth 2008 Straw Poll...

Click here for the poll over at GOP Bloggers.

Click here for the global results.


Monday, March 26, 2007

Bribing defeat with billions in pork... (updated)

Your Democratic Party in action.

Thanks to GatewayPundit:

Update: Tom Coburn's Top 10 Most Egregious Earmarks Contained in War Supplemental:
10. Allows transfer of funds from holiday ornament sales in the Senate gift shop

9. $3 million in funding for sugar cane

8. $3.5 million in additional funding for guided tours of the Capitol

7. $12 million for the Forest Service money which the President requested in the non-emergency fiscal year 2008 budget

6. $20 million for insect damage reimbursements in Nevada

5. $24 million in funding for sugar beets

4. $75 million for salaries and expenses for the Farm Service Agency

3. $165.9 million for fisheries disaster relief, funded through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

2. $40 million for the Tree Assistance Program

1. $100 million in funding for the 2008 national party conventions.
Also, here's who got bought.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, March 25, 2007

'Is 2008 The Year Conservatives Abandon The GOP?'

by Chuck Baldwin:
It is no hyperbole to say that conservatives throughout America are extremely disappointed and disillusioned with the national Republican Party. This discouragement is only deepened as they peruse the field of prominent candidates being trotted out as "frontrunners."

It appears that conservatives will be asked to choose between the chameleon Mitt Romney, the pro-amnesty-for-illegal-aliens John McCain, and philanderers Newt Gingrich and Rudy Giuliani. A few conservatives seem slightly excited that former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson is mulling entrance into the presidential race. However, a closer inspection of his voting record finds him to be just another globalist neocon, who would do little to change things in Washington, D.C. For example, Americans for Better Immigration gives him a puny career grade of "C."

The Republican Party’s unwillingness to advance a genuine conservative has left millions of grassroots Republicans on the verge of leaving the GOP. For example, a poll at the recent CPAC meeting found the "overwhelming majority of conservatives displeased with the leadership of the Republican Party, and most conservatives scowl at the thought of having to vote for Rudoph Giuliani, John McCain, or Mitt Romney."

In fact, the displeasure of grassroots conservatives with the GOP manifested itself in the creation of the Conservative Exodus Project (CEP), which was formed immediately following the recent CPAC meeting. According to organizers, CEP "is a vehicle for conservatives to leave the GOP if a real conservative presidential candidate is not chosen in 2008." Members pledge either to not vote, or to vote third party (e.g. Constitution Party).

CEP adherents use a fivefold litmus test to reveal a "real conservative." 1) He must oppose the "third-world invasion of the United States and reject amnesty and any path to citizenship for illegals." 2) He must "oppose free trade, the support of which has become an ideological suicide pact." 3) He must be a "moral candidate, critical of secularism, who embodies the virtues of the Christian Western tradition." 4) He must oppose the "illegal neocon war in Iraq." 5) He must "wish to see big government reduced in size-in all three branches-and for many offices and functions to be returned to the states, where they Constitutionally belong."

Proponents of the CEP make the following commitment: "Unless the above criteria are met, we pledge to stay home or vote third-party in 2008."

To which I say, Hallelujah! Not to the staying home part, but to the voting third-party part.

It is past time for conservatives to admit that the national Republican Party has crossed the point of no return and has no intention of nominating a genuine conservative for president. The GOP has become nothing more than a big-government, no-borders, war party. If true conservatives are going to have a voice in Washington politics, it will have to come through an independent party.

That is not to say that there are not genuine conservatives in the GOP presidential race. Congressman Ron Paul of Texas embodies everything the CEP is looking for. Beyond that, if he should miraculously win the nomination, he would, no doubt, receive broad support in the general election. He would solidify the conservative base of the GOP and would be very popular among independents, libertarians, and even conservative Democrats. ...

... The problem is, the GOP leadership, including the money-machine, refuses to support the independent-minded Ron Paul. They want another puppet to carry out the marching orders of their CFR cronies. However, if rank and file Republicans, and if Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and other leaders of the Religious Right, would support Ron Paul, the globalist elitists within the GOP could be defeated.

Absent a Ron Paul nomination, true conservatives will have nowhere to go next year, except to a third party. In fact, it is my prayer that if Paul does not obtain the Republican nomination, he would lead the exodus to the Constitution Party.

It is time for conservatives to do more than hold their noses and vote for the "lesser of two evils." It is time for them to vote their principles and their conscience. It is time to only support genuine conservatives, even if that means such candidates can only be found in a third party.

It’s too late for business-as-usual. We need a revolution! And thanks to the wisdom, sagacity, and foresight of America’s Founding Fathers, we have a system in place whereby the American people can change their government anytime they choose to do so. I pray 2008 will be the year they choose to do so.

To learn more about the Conservative Exodus Project, go to
We would like to stress these five points.

(1) We oppose the third-world invasion of the United States, and reject amnesty and any path to citizenship for illegals. We support deportation, attrition, and massive reductions in legal immigration, especially from the third world.

(2) We oppose free trade, the support of which has become an ideological suicide pact. Free trade is both destroying our economy and undermining our sovereignty. Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should, but many in the GOP have been "neoconned" on this issue.

(3) We support a moral candidate, critical of secularism, who embodies the virtues of the Christian Western tradition.

(4) We oppose the illegal neocon war in Iraq. The transformation of the Middle East to liberal democracy is Jacobin, not conservative.

(5) We wish to see big government reduced in size - in all three branches - and for many offices and functions to be returned to the states, where they Constitutionally belong.
To learn more about the Constitution Party, go to
I'm thinking more and more... Tom Tancredo for President.

Status Quo Redux

Labels: , , , , , , ,

'You were the Veep, but you need to shut. up. now.'

From shatterglass:

(hat tip Allah)

Labels: , ,

Thursday, March 22, 2007

A Conservative Nation...

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

'Feelings, not objective standards, are what society deems most important'... (updated)

Dennis PragerFeelings... nothing more than feelings.

Unbelievable. From Dennis Prager's latest: Compassion and the Decline of America...
This past weekend, a friend of mine attended his 13-year-old son's baseball game. What he saw encapsulates a major reason many of us fear for the future of America and the West.

His son's team was winning 24-7 as the game entered the last inning. When he looked up at the scoreboard, he noticed that the score read 0-0. Naturally, he inquired as to what happened -- was the scoreboard perhaps broken? -- and was told that the winning team's coach asked the scoreboard keeper to change the score. He and some of the parents were concerned that the boys on the losing team felt humiliated.

Compassion and the Decline of AmericaIn order to ensure that the boys losing by a lopsided score would not feel too bad, the score was changed.

As is happening throughout America, compassion trumped all other values.

Truth was the first value compassion trashed. In the name of compassion, the adults in charge decided to lie. The score was not 0-0; it was 24-7.

Wisdom was the second value compassion obliterated. It is unwise to the point of imbecilic to believe that the losing boys were in any way helped by changing the score. On the contrary, they learned lessons that will hamper their ability to mature.

  • They learned that someone will bail them out when they feel bad.

    They learned that they do not have to
    deal with disappointment in life.
    Instead, someone in authority
    will take care of them.

  • They learned that they do not have to deal with disappointment in life. Instead, someone in authority will take care of them. (This is how reliance on the state for personal problems -- the worldview of the Left -- is formed early in life.)

  • They learned that their feelings, not objective standards, are what society deems most important.

  • They learned that they are not responsible for their behavior. No matter how poorly they perform, there will be no consequences -- sort of like tenure for university professors.

  • They also learned to think in the feminine -- with an emphasis on feelings -- rather than to cultivate their innate masculine sense that winners win and losers learn to deal with it and move on to the next game.

  • At the same time, the boys on the winning team learned not to try their best. Why bother?

    Building character was the third value trumped by compassion. People build character far more through handling defeat than through winning. The human being grows up only when forced to deal with disappointment. We remain children until the day we take full responsibility for our lives. Our increasingly feelings-based society has created a pandemic of immaturity in our society. And there are fewer and fewer maturity-creating institutions in our society. Indeed, the opposite is more often the case. Schools, for example, keep young people immature, none more so than college, which serves primarily to postpone adulthood.

    The fourth value that compassion denied here was fairness. It is remarkable how often compassion-based liberals speak of "fairness" in formulating social policy given how unfair so many of their policies are. It was entirely unfair to the winning team to have their score expunged, all their work denied. But for the compassion-first crowd, the winning team is like "the rich" who earn "too much" and should therefore be penalized with a higher tax rate; the winning team scored "too many" runs to be allowed to keep them all.

    Compassion in social policy almost always produces unfair results. Compassion for murderers allows them to keep their lives after taking the life of another. Compassion for minorities leads to affirmative action, which means that individuals who are not members of a designated minority will be treated unfairly. Compassion for immigrant children led to bilingual education, which subsequently prevented most of those children from advancing in American society.

    Compassion as the primary determinant of behavior is effective in personal life. In making public policy, it is a morally and socially destructive guideline. In fact, it is so bad that thinking people must conclude that its primary purpose is to enable policy makers who are guided by compassion to feel good about themselves.
  • Spot on as usual.

    Update: Michael Medved ties this into the larger view of todays liberalism with his latest titled The Essence of Liberalism: Embracing Life's Losers:
    ...The rhetoric of today’s left shows that they see society divided between the privileged and the powerless, the favored and the unfortunate, victors and victims.

    Liberals feel an irresistible instinct to take sides with the less fortunate.

    While the right wants to reward beneficial choices and discourage destructive directions, the left seeks to eliminate or reduce the impact of the disadvantages that result from bad decisions. In place of the conservative emphasis on accountability, the left proffers a gospel of indiscriminate compassion.

    This leads directly, and inevitably, to the liberal passion to sanctify victimhood.

    "Enlightened" lefties long to embrace and exalt all those who claim to have suffered from hard luck or oppression: the homeless, single mothers, "people of color," homosexuals, AIDS patients, feminists, convicted criminals, Native Americans, atheists, immigrants and many more. Recent Democratic Conventions have resembled festivals of fine whines, with countless testimonials from one victim group or another expressing hopelessness and helplessness unless the Donkey Party returned to power. ...
    Read it all here.

    Update: Bill O'Reilly says "Be careful what you vote for. Compassion can easily turn into chaos."

    Labels: , , , ,

    Monday, March 19, 2007

    Must-watch video from Glenn Beck on the outrageous porkers in Congress...

    I saw this show last week and hoped someone would post it. Glenn is on the money as usual... blood money that is:

    And from the same show, Glenn appropriately skewers Bush on his ridiculous "migration" reform speech in Mexico:

    George Bush... the worst president ever? Maybe not, but it's sure debatable. He's certainly stalled any momentum the conservative movement had going for it.

    I'm praying for Fred Thompson in '08 at this point... maybe with Newt on the ticket with him.

    Labels: , , , ,

    Sunday, March 18, 2007

    The Gathering of Eagles...

    Here's the website. Michelle Malkin has the coverage of the event.

    Here is Monday's Vent from HotAir also...

    Bryan from HotAir writes:
    ... There was no Soros Santa on our side marketing the march and bussing people in from all over the country. People drove through ice storms to get there, because they believed it was their duty to support the troops who are putting their lives on the line every single day to defend us. And they were noticed. If you were there, you were noticed. March 17, 2007 was a day that will go down as the first day that patriots decided to answer ANSWER man for man and woman for woman. Cindy Sheehan and Jane Fonda and the anti-America chorus didn’t monopolize the day. Veterans, bikers, and moms and dads and kids wouldn’t let them. Not anymore. It was a historic day. ...
    ... and this great ad from Move America Forward going nationwide this week:

    Update: Will we ever learn Mr. Buckley’s lesson? by Katie O'Malley

    Labels: , , ,

    Thursday, March 15, 2007

    Ravi Zacharias - the current reigning king of apologetics, and Turner's 'Creed'...

    Ravi Zacharias included Steve Turner's "Creed" in his latest book "Can Man Live Without God?". It's a great satirical piece that should really be titled "Liberal Creed". Are you part of this "we"?:
    This is the creed I have written on behalf of all us.

    We believe in Marxfreudanddarwin
    We believe everything is OK
    as long as you don't hurt anyone,
    to the best of your definition of hurt,
    and to the best of your knowledge.

    We believe in sex before, during, and after marriage.
    We believe in the therapy of sin.
    We believe that adultery is fun.
    We believe that sodomy is OK.
    We believe that taboos are taboo.

    We believe that everything is getting better
    despite evidence to the contrary.
    The evidence must be investigated
    And you can prove anything with evidence.

    We believe there's something in
    horoscopes, UFO's and bent spoons;
    Jesus was a good man
    just like Buddha, Mohammed, and ourselves.
    He was a good moral teacher
    although we think His good morals were bad.

    We believe that all religions are basically the same--
    at least the one that we read was.
    They all believe in love and goodness.
    They only differ on matters of
    creation, sin, heaven, hell, God, and salvation.

    We believe that after death comes the Nothing
    Because when you ask the dead what happens they say nothing.
    If death is not the end, if the dead have lied,
    then it's compulsory heaven for all
    excepting perhaps Hitler, Stalin, and Genghis Khan.

    We believe in Masters and Johnson.
    What's selected is average.
    What's average is normal.
    What's normal is good.

    We believe in total disarmament.
    We believe there are direct links between warfare and bloodshed.
    Americans should beat their guns into tractors
    and the Russians would be sure to follow.

    We believe that man is essentially good.
    It's only his behavior that lets him down.
    This is the fault of society.
    Society is the fault of conditions.
    Conditions are the fault of society.

    We believe that each man must find the truth that is right for him.
    Reality will adapt accordingly.
    The universe will readjust.
    History will alter.
    We believe that there is no absolute truth
    excepting the truth that there is no absolute truth.

    We believe in the rejection of creeds,
    and the flowering of individual thought.
    Thanks to BLY for passing it along.

    Related: Here is an excerpt from jhargreaves321 of a recent interview with Ravi Zacharias on 'how do you know there is a God?':

    There is a great six video series of that interview on YouTube if you want to check them out. Here's the link to the first one... then II, III, IV, V and VI.

    I'm with Chuck Coulson on how this ties into some current events:
    ...[W]e live in an age that no longer believes in objective truth or a moral order. Moral relativism is the rule, and personal preference trumps all. And government is there to ensure that no one place any restraint on the pursuit of our own desires.

    I have long said that C. S. Lewis was prophetic when in 1943 he wrote about the irony of our education system, saying, "Such is the tragicomedy of our situation—we continue to clamour for those very qualities we are rendering impossible. . . . In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."

    Ironic that today, the head of our Joint Chiefs of Staff argues that the military should have consistent policies of moral integrity, and the world demands an apology. Maybe it is time to lock him up: General Pace is guilty. He has committed the intolerable crime of our day: He has stated his conviction in a value-free society that respects only so-called "tolerance."

    As for me, well, General Pace makes me proud that I am a former Marine.

    Labels: , , ,